A Systematic Literature Review of Online Learning Spanning 26 Years (1993–2018)
Publication: Journal of Education for Library and Information Science
Volume 64, Number 3
Abstract
This article aims to provide the reader with a comprehensive background for understanding current knowledge on online learning through a systematic literature review of the published literature in peer-reviewed English language journals. We reviewed 5,803 articles published over 26 years (1993–2018). We focused on the number of articles published, journals’ names, and overall research trends about online learning. We reviewed the growth and evolution of keywords, titles, and abstracts to develop an understanding of the growth and fall of trends in research on online learning. We discovered that the dominant trends in the published articles on online learning are learning, students, environment, courses, education, and teaching. The growing areas are online delivery, learning in online setting, teacher (teaching), and students (learners), and we discuss the gaps in the discipline that indicate a potential growth area for the future of the discipline including technology research.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Antonaci, A., Klemke, R., & Specht, M. (2019). The effects of gamification in online learning environments: A systematic literature review. Informatics, 6(3), 32; https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics6030032
Bates, T. (2014). A short history of educational technology. https://tonybates.wpengine.com/2014/12/10/a-short-history-of-educational-technology/
Bates, T. et al. (2018). Tracking online and distance education in Canadian universities and colleges 2018. Halifax, NS: Canadian Digital Learning Research Association.
Bates, A.W. (2019). Teaching in a digital age – Second edition. Vancouver, B.C.: Tony Bates Associates Ltd. Retrieved from https://pressbooks.bccampus.ca/teachinginadigitalagev2/
Boelens, R., Wever B. D., & Voet, M. (2017). Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 22, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.06.001
Cook, D., Garside, S., Levinson, A. J., Dupras, D. M., & Montori, V. M. (2010). What do we mean by web-based learning? A systematic review of the variability of interventions. Medical Education, 44, 765–744. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03723.x
Digital Learning Compass. (2017). Distance Education Enrolment Report 2017 Wellesley, MA.
Chiappe, A & Rodríguez, P. (2017) Learning Analytics in 21st century education: a review Ensaio: aval. pol. públ. educ. 25 (97) • Oct-Dec 2017. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-40362017002501211
Halverson, L. R., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. J., Drysdale, J. S., & Henrie, C. R. (2014). A thematic analysis of the most highly cited scholarship in the first decade of blended learning research. Internet and Higher Education. 20 (1), pp. 20-34. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.09.004
Yu-Chen Hsu, Hsin Ning Jessie Ho, Chin-Chung Tsai, Gwo-Jen Hwang, Hui-Chun Chu, Chin-Yeh Wang, & Nian-Shing Chen. (2012). Research Trends in Technology-based Learning from 2000 to 2009: A content Analysis of Publications in Selected Journals. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(2), 354-370. Retrieved September 7, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.15.2.354
Hwang, G.-J., & Tsai, C.-C. (2011). Research trends in mobile and ubiquitous learning: a review of publications in selected journals from 2001 to 2010. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), E65-E70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01183.x
Maria, K., Traynor, M., & Martin, D. (2014). A systematic review evaluating the impact of online or blended learning vs. face-to-face learning of clinical skills in undergraduate nurse education. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 71(2), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12509
Martin, F., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L. and Budhrani, K. (2017). Systematic review of two decades (1995 to 2014) of research on synchronous online learning. American Journal of Distance Education, 31(1), 3–19, https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2017.1264807
McCutcheon, K., Lohan, M., Traynor, M., & Martin, D. (2015) A systematic review evaluating the impact of online or blended learning vs. face-to-face learning of clinical skills in undergraduate nurse education. Journal of Advanced Nursing 71(2), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12509
Miller, A., Topper, A. M., & Richardson, S. (2017). Suggestions for improving IPEDS distance education data collection. (NPEC 2017). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Postsecondary Education Cooperative. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch
Moore, J., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, K. (2011). E-learning, online learning and distance learning environments: Are they the same? The Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.10.001
Morgan, H. (2020). Best practices for implementing remote learning during a pandemic. The Clearing House: A journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 93(3). 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2020.1751480
Nunn, S., Avella, J., Kanai, T., & Kebritchi, M. (2016). Learning analytics methods, benefits, and challenges in higher education: A systematic literature review. Online Learning, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v20i2.790
Oliver, M. (2014). Fostering relevant research on educational communications and technology. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, ed. J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, and M. J. Bishop, 909–918. New York: Springer.
Petersen, A., Pan, R., Pammolli, F., & Fortunato, S. (2019). Methods to account for citation inflation in research evaluation. Research Policy, 48(7), 1855–1865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.04.009
Rodriguez Triana, M. J., Prieto Santos, L. P., Vozniuk, A., Shirvani Boroujeni, M., Schwendimann, B. A., Holzer, A. C., & Gillet, D. (2017). Monitoring, awareness, and reflection in blended technology enhanced learning: A systematic review. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 9(2/3), 126–150. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2017.084489
Singh, V. & Thurman, A. (2019). How many ways can we define online learning? A systematic literature review of definitions of online learning (1988–2018). American Journal of Distance Education, 33(4), 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2019.1663082
Shahini, R., Davis, H., & Borthwick, K. (2019). Design recommendations to address cultural issues in multicultural MOOCs: a systematic literature review. In Plutino, A., Borthwick, K., & Corradini, E. (Eds.), New educational landscapes: innovative perspectives in language learning and technology (pp. 55–66). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2019.36.956
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Education for Library and Information Science
Volume 64 • Number 3 • July 2023
Pages: 233 - 256
Copyright
Association for Library and Information Science Education. For their own personal use, users may read, download, print, search, or link to the full text. Manuscripts published in Journal of Education for Library and Information Science are copyrighted to Association for Library and Information Science Education. Requests for permission to reproduce this article should be made to the University of Toronto Press using the Permission Request Form: https://www.utpjournals.press/about/permissions or by email: [email protected].
History
Received: 25 November 2020
Revision received: 6 May 2021
Accepted: 13 May 2021
Published ahead of print: 14 October 2021
Published in print: July 2023
Published online: 2 August 2023
Keywords:
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Related Content
Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Download article citation data for:
Journal of Education for Library and Information Science 2023 64:3, 233-256
Journal of Education for Library and Information Science 2023 64:3, 233-256