Gender-Based Analysis Plus in Canada: Problems and Possibilities of Integrating Intersectionality
Abstract
Abstract
International debate is ongoing regarding the innovation of gender mainstreaming (GM), its efficacy, and future utility. Likewise, in Canada, there is a push to learn from early GM efforts and a renewed focus on creating more responsive mainstreaming strategies. Although Canada’s gender-based analysis (GBA) has been researched and evaluated, this study uses the feminist theory of intersectionality to examine the newer GBA+ model, which builds on its predecessor. Drawing on thematic analysis of 32 stakeholder interviews from three different sectors and content analysis of key policy reports, we investigate how the shift to this new model is perceived, whether inclusion of the “+” results in greater responsiveness, and how to better operationalize intersectionality in policy contexts.
Résumé
Le débat soulevé par l’instauration du paritarisme, son efficacité et son utilité future persiste sur la scène internationale. Au Canada, l’on observe parallèlement une volonté de tirer des leçons des premiers efforts de paritarisme et un regain d’intérêt pour la création de stratégies mieux adaptées à l’intégration des considérations qui y sont liées. Bien que l’analyse comparative entre les sexes (ACS) ait fait l’objet d’études et d’évaluations au Canada, les auteures ont recours à la théorie féministe de l’intersectionnalité pour examiner le modèle plus récent de l’ACS+, reposant sur son prédécesseur. En se fondant sur les résultats d’une analyse thématique de 32 entrevues réalisées auprès de parties prenantes issues de trois secteurs différents ainsi que d’une analyse du contenu de trois importants rapports moraux, elles se penchent sur la façon dont est perçu le virage vers ce nouveau modèle et se demandent si l’adjonction du « + » accroît la réactivité et comment assurer une meilleure opérationnalisation des considérations liées à l’intersectionnalité dans les politiques.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Allwood, G. 2013. “Gender Mainstreaming and Policy Coherence for Development: Unintended Gender Consequences and EU Policy.” Women’s Studies International Forum 39:42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2013.01.008.
Alonso, A. 2012. “Intersectionality by Other Means? New Equality Policies in Portugal.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 19(4):596–621. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxs017.
Bacchi, C.L. 2017. “Policies as Gendering Practices: Re-Viewing Categorical Distinctions.” Journal of Women, Politics & Process 38(1):20–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2016.1198207.
Bacchi, C.L., and J. Eveline. 2009. “Gender Mainstreaming or Diversity Mainstreaming? The Politics of ‘Doing.’” NORA—Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 17(1):2–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740802689133.
Bacchi, C.L., and J. Eveline. 2010. “Gender/ing Impact Assessment: Can It Be Made to Work?” In Mainstreaming Politics: Gendering Practices and Feminist Theory, ed. C.L. Bacchi and J. Eveline, 17–19. Adelaide, SA: University of Adelaide Press.
Beveridge, F., and S. Nott. 2002. “Mainstreaming: A Case for Optimism and Cynicism.” Feminist Legal Studies 10(3–4):299–311. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021288101039.
Bustelo, M. 2017. “Evaluation from a Gender+ Perspective as a Key Element for (Re)gendering the Policymaking Process.” Journal of Women, Politics & Process 38(1):84–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2016.1198211.
Bustelo, M., L. Ferguson, and M. Forest, eds. 2016. The Politics of Feminist Knowledge Transfer: Gender Training and Gender Expertise. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Canada. Parliament. House of Commons. 2016. Standing Committee on the Status of Women (FEWO). “Implementing Gender-Based Analysis Plus in the Government of Canada.” June. 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. At http://www.ourcommons.ca/DocumentViewer/en/42-1/FEWO/report-4/.
Canadian Research Institute for the Advancement of Women (CRIAW). 2006. “Intersectional Feminist Frameworks: An Emerging Vision.” Ottawa: CRIAW. At http://www.criaw-icref.ca/sites/criaw/files/The%20IFFs-%20An%20Emerging%20Vision.pdf.
Cavaghan, R. 2017a. “Bridging Rhetoric and Practice: New Perspectives on Barriers to Gendered Change.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 38(1):2–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2016.1198209.
Cavaghan, R. 2017b. Making Gender Equality Happen: Knowledge, Change and Resistance in EU Gender Mainstreaming. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Clegg, S.R. 1989. “Radical Revisions: Power, Discipline and Organizations.” Organization Studies 10(1):97–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084068901000106.
Corus, C., B. Saatcioglu, C. Kaufman-Scarborough, C.P. Blocker, S. Upadhyaya, and S. Appau. 2016. “Transforming Poverty-Related Policy with Intersectionality.” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 35(2):211–22. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.15.141.
Crespi, I. 2009. “Gender Differences and Equality Issues in Europe: Critical Aspects of Gender Mainstreaming Policies.” International Review of Sociology 19(1):171–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906700802614010.
Creswell, J. 2014. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. London: Sage.
Djoudi, H., B. Locatelli, C. Vaast, K. Asher, M. Brockhaus, and B. Basnett Sijapati. 2016. “Beyond Dichotomies: Gender and Intersecting Inequalities in Climate Change Studies.” Ambio 45(3):248–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0825-2.
Donaghy, T.B. 2004. “Mainstreaming: Northern Ireland’s Participative-Democratic Approach.” Policy & Politics 32(1):49–62. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557304772860049.
Einarsdóttir, T. 2003. “Challenging the Slow Motion of Gender Equality—The Case of Iceland.” Paper presented at the 5th European Feminist Research Conference, Lund University, Sweden, 22–24 August.
Eveline, J., C.L. Bacchi, and J. Binns. 2009. “Gender Mainstreaming versus Diversity Mainstreaming: Methodology as Emancipatory Politics.” Gender, Work, and Organisation 16(2):198–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2008.00427.x.
Government of Canada. 2017. Thinking about Gender in Military Planning and Operations. At http://www.forces.gc.ca/en/operations-how/perspectives.page.
Government of Canada. 2018a. Budget 2018’s Gender Results Framework. At https://www.budget.gc.ca/2018/docs/plan/chap-05-en.html#framework.
Government of Canada. 2018b. Canada’s Feminist International Assistance Policy. At http://international.gc.ca/world-monde/issues_development-enjeux_developpement/priorities-priorites/policy-politique.aspx?lang=eng.
Government of Manitoba. 2017. “Province Proclaims Third Week in January Women’s Equality Week.” At http://news.gov.mb.ca/news/index.html?item=40491.
Hancock, A.-M. 2007. “When Multiplication Doesn’t Equal Quick Addition: Examining Intersectionality as a Research Paradigm.” Perspectives on Politics 5(1):63–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592707070065.
Hankivsky, O. 2005. “Gender vs. Diversity Mainstreaming: A Preliminary Examination of the Role and Transformative Potential of Feminist Theory.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 38(4):977–1001. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423905040783.
Hankivsky, O. 2008. “Gender Mainstreaming in Canada and Australia: A Comparative Analysis.” Policy and Society 27(1):69–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2008.07.006.
Hankivsky, O. 2012. “The Lexicon of Mainstreaming Equality: Gender Based Analysis (GBA), Gender and Diversity Analysis (GDA) and Intersectionality Based Analysis (IBA).” Canadian Political Science Review 6(2–3):171–83. At https://ojs.unbc.ca/index.php/cpsr/article/view/278.
Hankivsky, O. 2013. “Gender Mainstreaming: A Five-Country Examination.” Politics & Policy 41(5):629–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12037.
Hankivsky, O. 2014a. Intersectionality 101. Vancouver: Simon Fraser University. At http://vawforum-cwr.ca/sites/default/files/attachments/intersectionallity_101.pdf.
Hankivsky, O. 2014b. “Rethinking Care Ethics: On the Promise and Potential of an Intersectional Analysis.” American Political Science Review 108(2):252–64. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055414000094.
Hankivsky, O., and R. Cormier. 2011. “Intersectionality and Public Policy: Some Lessons from Existing Models.” Political Research Quarterly 64(1):217–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912910376385.
Hankivsky, O., D. Grace, G. Hunting, O. Ferlatte, N. Clark, A. Fridkin, M.G.S. Rudrum, and T. Laviolette. 2012. Intersectionality-Based Policy Analysis. Vancouver: Simon Fraser University. At https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Olivier_Ferlatte/publication/310818566_Intersectionality-Based_Policy_Analysis/links/583877a108ae3a74b49d1757/Intersectionality-Based-Policy-Analysis.pdf.
Harcourt, W. 2016. The Palgrave Handbook of Gender and Development. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hearn, J. 2006. “Men and Gender Equality Policy.” EU Finnish Presidency Conference on Men and Gender Equality, Helsinki, 5–6 October. At https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242324114_Men_and_Gender_Equality_Policy.
Holter, Ø., V. Riesenfeld, and E. Scambor. 2005. “We Don’t Have Anything Like That Here!’ Organisations, Men and Gender Equality.” In Work Changes Gender: Men and Equality in the Transition of Labour Forms, ed. R. Puchert, M. Gärtner, and S. Höyng, 73–103. Opladen, Germany: Verlag Barbara Budrich.
Kantola, J. 2010. Gender and the European Union. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Krizsan, A., H. Skjeie, and J. Squires. 2012. “Institutionalizing Intersectionality: A Theoretical Framework.” In: Institutionalizing Intersectionality. ed. A. Krizsan, H. Skjeie, and J. Squires, 1–32. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lamprell, G., and J. Braithwaite. 2017. “Mainstreaming Gender and Promoting Intersectionality in Papua New Guinea’s Health Policy: A Triangulated Analysis Applying Data-Mining and Content Analytic Techniques.” Journal for Equity in Health 16(1):65. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-017-0555-5.
Lombardo, E., and L.R. Agustin. 2016. “Intersectionality in European Union Policymaking: The Case of Gender-based Violence.” Politics 36(4):364–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395716635184.
Lombardo, E., and M. Forest. 2012. The Europeanization of Gender Equality Policies: A Discursive-Sociological Approach. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
Lombardo, E., P. Meier, and M. Verloo. 2009. The Discursive Politics of Gender Equality: Stretching Bending and Policy-Making. London: Routledge.
Lombardo, E., P. Meier, and M. Verloo. 2017. “Policymaking from a Gender+ Equality Perspective.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 38(1):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2016.1198206.
Lombardo, E., and M. Verloo. 2009. “Institutionalizing Intersectionality in the European Union?” International Feminist Journal of Politics 11(4):478–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616740903237442.
López, N., and V.L. Gadsden. 2016. “Health Inequities, Social Determinants, and Intersectionality.” Discussion Paper, December. National Academy of Medicine, Washington, DC.
Mahoney, J., and K. Thelen. 2010. Explaining Institutional Change Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Manning, S., P. Johnson, and J. Acker-Verney. 2016. “Uneasy Intersections: Critical Understandings of Gender and Disability in Global Development.” Third World Thematics 1(3):292–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/23802014.2016.1242091.
Mazur, A. 2016. “Mainstreaming Gender in Political Science Courses: The Case of Comparative Public Policy.” PS: Political Science & Politics 43(3):562–65. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096516000998.
McCall, L. 2005. “The Complexity of Intersectionality.” Signs 30(3):1771–800. https://doi.org/10.1086/426800.
McNutt, K. 2010. “An Integrated Approach to Gender Equality: From Gender-Based Analysis to Gender Mainstreaming.” Working Paper Series, Issue 2, Johnson Shoyama School of Public Policy. At http://www.academia.edu/223576/An_Integrated_Approach_to_Gender_Equality_From_Gender-Based_Analysis_to_Gender_Mainstreaming.
McNutt, K. 2013. “Politics, Policy, and Participation: Contemporary Issues in Canadian Gender Equality.” Canadian Political Science Review 6(2–3):139–41. At https://ojs.unbc.ca/index.php/cpsr/article/view/472.
Mergaert, L., and E. Lombardo. 2014. “Resistance to Implementing Gender Mainstreaming in EU Research Policy.” European Integration Online Papers, 18(1):1–21, Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1695/2014005.
Mukhopadhyay, M. 2016. “‘Mainstreaming Gender or Streaming Gender Away’ Revisited.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Gender and Development, ed. W. Harcourt, 132–42. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Native Women’s Association of Canada. 2007. “Social Determinants of Health and Canada’s Aboriginal Women.” At https://www.nwac.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/2007-Social-Determinants-of-Health-and-Canada%E2%80%99s-Aboriginal-Women-NWAC-Submission-to-WHO-Commission.pdf.
Native Women’s Association of Canada. 2010. “A Culturally Relevant Gender Application Protocol.” At https://nwac.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/2010-NWAC-What-is-a-Culturally-Relevant-Gender-Application-Protocol.pdf.
Office of Auditor General of Canada (OAGC). 2009. “Chapter 1—Gender-Based Analysis.” In 2009 Spring Report of the Auditor General of Canada. At http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/parl_oag_200905_01_e_32514.html.
Office of Auditor General of Canada. 2016. “Report 1—Implementing Gender-Based Analysis.” At http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/parl_oag_201602_01_e_41058.html.
Parken, A. 2010. “A Multi-Strand Approach to Promoting Equalities and Human Rights in Policy Making.” Policy & Politics 38(1):79–99. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557309X445690.
Paterson, S. 2010. “What’s the Problem with Gender-Based Analysis? Gender Mainstreaming Policy and Practice in Canada.” Canadian Public Administration/Administration publique du Canada 53(3):395–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-7121.2010.00134.x.
Paterson, S., P. Marier, and F. Chu. 2016. “Technocracy or Transformation? Mapping Women’s Policy Agencies and Orienting Gender (In)Equality in the Canadian Provinces.” Canadian Public Administration/Administration publique du Canada 59(3):405–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12178.
Paterson, S., and F. Scala. 2017. “Gender Mainstreaming and the Discursive Politics of Public Service Values.” Administrative Theory & Praxis 39(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2016.1273726.
Pease, B. 2006. “Gendering Men: Implications for Gender Equality.” In Men and Gender Equality: Towards Progressive Policies, ed. J. Varanka, A. Närhinen, and R. Siukola, 38–46. Helsinki: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health.
Rochette, A. 2016. “Climate Change Is a Social Justice Issue: The Need for a Gender-Based Analysis of Mitigation and Adaptation Policies in Canada and Quebec.” Journal of Environmental Law and Practice 29:387–410.
Rodriguez, J.K., E. Holvino, J.K. Fletcher, and S.M. Nkomo. 2016. “The Theory and Praxis of Intersectionality in Work and Organisations: Where Do We Go From Here? Gender, Work and Organization.” Gender Work and Organization 23(3):201–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12131.
Scala, F., and S. Paterson. 2017. “Gendering Public Policy or Rationalizing Gender? Strategic Interventions and GBA+ Practice in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique 50(2):427–42. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423917000221.
Scala, F., and S. Paterson. 2018. “Stories from the Front Lines: Making Sense of Gender Mainstreaming in Canada.” Politics & Gender 14(2):208–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X17000526.
Squires, J. 2005. “Is Mainstreaming Transformative? Theorizing Mainstreaming in the Context of Diversity and Deliberation.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 12(3):366–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxi020.
Squires, J. 2007. “Negotiating Equality and Diversity in Britain: Towards a Differentiated Citizenship?” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 10(4):531–59.
Status of Women Canada (SWC). 2004. “An Integrated Approach to Gender-Based Analysis—Information Kit.” At http://publications.gc.ca/site/eng/294256/publication.html.
Status of Women Canada (SWC). 2009. “Departmental Action Plan on Gender-Based Analysis.” At https://www.swc-cfc.gc.ca/gba-acs/ap-pa-eng.pdf.
Status of Women Canada (SWC). 2015. “The GBA+ Framework: A Guide to Building Organizational Capacity for Gender-Based Analysis+.” At https://www.swc-cfc.gc.ca/gba-acs/guide-eng.pdf.
Status of Women Canada (SWC). 2016a. “Action Plan on Gender-Based Analysis.” At https://www.swc-cfc.gc.ca/gba-acs/ap-pa-eng.pdf.
Status of Women Canada (SWC). 2016b. “2016–17 Report on Plans and Priorities of Status of Women Canada.” At https://www.swc-cfc.gc.ca/trans/account-resp/pr/rpp/1617/01-en.html.
Status of Women Canada (SWC). 2017a. “Apply GBA+ to Your Work.” At https://www.swc-cfc.gc.ca/gba-acs/apply-appliquez-en.html.
Status of Women Canada (SWC). 2017b. “Introduction to GBA+: Module 1—Sex and Gender—A Place to Begin.” At https://www.swc-cfc.gc.ca/gba-acs/course-cours-2017/eng/mod01/mod01_01_01.html.
Status of Women Canada (SWC). 2017c. “Introduction to GBA+: Module 2—Moving beyond Sex and Gender.” At https://www.swc-cfc.gc.ca/gba-acs/course-cours-2017/eng/mod02/mod02_01_01.html.
Status of Women Canada (SWC). 2017d. “Mythbusters.” At https://www.swc-cfc.gc.ca/gba-acs/index-en.html#myth.
Status of Women Canada (SWC). 2017e. “Resources GBA+.” At https://www.swc-cfc.gc.ca/gba-acs/resources-ressources-en.html.
Status of Women Canada (SWC). 2017f. “What Is GBA+?” At https://www.swc-cfc.gc.ca/gba-acs/index-en.html.
Strid, S., S. Walby, and J. Armstrong. 2013. “Intersectionality and Multiple Inequalities: Visibility in British Policy on Violence Against Women.” Social Politics 20(4):558–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxt019.
Timoshkina, N. 2013. “Anti-Human Trafficking Project of the Women’s Support Network of York Region: GBA+ Report.” At http://womenssupportnetwork.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/AHTP-of-WSN-GBA-Report.pdf.
Tolhurst, R., B. Leach, J. Price, J. Robinson, E. Ettore, A. Scott-Samuel, N. Kilonzog, L.P. Sabuni, S. Robertson, A. Kapilashrami, et al. 2012. “Intersectionality and Gender Mainstreaming in International Health: Using a Feminist Participatory Action Research Process to Analyse Voices and Debates from the Global South and North.” Social Science and Medicine 74(11):1825–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.08.025.
United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC). 1997. “Economic and Social Council Agreed Conclusions 1997/2 on Mainstreaming the Gender Perspective into All Policies and Programmes in the United Nations System.” At http://www.un.org/womenwatch/osagi/pdf/ECOSOCAC1997.2.PDF.
van den Brink, M., and Y. Benschop. 2018. “Gender Interventions in the Dutch Police Force: Resistance as a Tool for Change?” Journal of Change Management 18(3):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2017.1378695.
van der Haar, M., and M. Verloo. 2013. “Unpacking the Russian Doll: Gendered and Intersectionalized Categories in European Gender Equality Policies.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 1(3):417–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2013.816246.
Verloo, M. 2006. “Multiple Inequalities, Intersectionality and the European Union.” European Journal of Women’s Studies 13(3):211–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506806065753.
Verloo, M., P. Meier, S. Lauwers, and S. Martens. 2012. “Putting Intersectionality into Practice in Different Configurations of Equality Architecture: Belgium and the Netherlands.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 19(4):513–38. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxs021.
Verloo, M., S. Walby, J. Armstrong, and S. Strid. 2009. “Deliverable No. 62: Final STRIQ Report.” At https://cps.ceu.edu/sites/cps.ceu.edu/files/quing-striq-report-2009.pdf.
Walby, S. 2011. The Future of Feminism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Women’s Legal Education and Action Fund (LEAF). 2016. “Re: Closing the Gender Wage Gap.” At https://www.leaf.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/2016-01-22-LEAF-Submission-Gender-Wage-Gap-Consultation.pdf.
Yuval-Davis, N. 2006. “Intersectionality and Feminist Politics.” European Journal of Women’s Studies 13(3):193–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506806065752.
Zalewski, M. 2010. “‘I Don’t Even Know What Gender Is:’ A Discussion of the Connections between Gender, Gender Mainstreaming and Feminist Theory.” Review of International Studies 36(1):3–27. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210509990489.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Canadian Public Policy
Volume 44 • Number 4 • December 2018
Pages: 303 - 316
Copyright
© Canadian Public Policy / Analyse de politiques.
History
Published in print: December 2018
Published online: 4 January 2019
Keywords :
Mots clés :
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Related Content
Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Download article citation data for:
Canadian Public Policy 2018 44:4, 303-316
Canadian Public Policy 2018 44:4, 303-316