Mapping Physiotherapy Use in Canada in Relation to Physiotherapist Distribution
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose: In this cross-sectional study, we examined the distribution of physiotherapists at the health region level across Canada in relation to self-reported physiotherapy use across the provinces and territories. Method: We drew on two data sources: the physiotherapy use question from the 2014 Canadian Community Health Survey and physiotherapists’ primary employment information, obtained from the Canadian Institute of Health Information’s 2015 Physiotherapist Database. We then applied geospatial mapping and Pearson’s correlation analysis to the resulting variables. Results: Physiotherapy use is moderately associated with the distribution of physiotherapists (Pearson’s r92 = 0.581, p < 0.001). The use and distribution variables were converted into three categories using SDs of 0.5 from national means as cut-off values. Cross-classification between the variables revealed that 15.2% of health regions have a high use–high distribution ratio; 18.5% have a low use–low distribution ratio; 4.3% have a high use–low distribution ratio; 2.2% have a low use–high distribution ratio; and 60.0% have medium use–medium distribution ratio. Conclusions: The distribution of physiotherapists and self-reported physiotherapy use varies across health regions, indicating a potential inequality in geographical access. Given that most provinces have a regionalized approach to health human resources and health service delivery, these findings may be helpful to managers and policy-makers and may allow them to make a more granular comparison of intra- and inter-provincial differences and potential gaps.
Résumé
Objectif : la présente étude transversale a porté sur la répartition des physiothérapeutes dans les régions sanitaires du Canada par rapport à l’utilisation déclarée des services de physiothérapie dans les provinces et territoires. Méthodologie : les chercheurs ont puisé dans deux sources de données : la question sur l’utilisation des services de physiothérapie de l’Enquête sur la santé dans les collectivités canadiennes de 2014 et les renseignements sur l’emploi primaire des physiothérapeutes tirés de la Base de données sur les physiothérapeutes de l’Institut canadien d’information sur la santé de 2015. Ils ont ensuite appliqué la cartographie géospatiale et l’analyse de corrélation de Pearson aux variables obtenues. Résultats : l’utilisation des services de physiothérapie s’associe modérément à la répartition des physiothérapeutes (r92 de Pearson = 0,581, p < 0,001). Les chercheurs ont converti les variables d’utilisation et de répartition en trois catégories, dont les seuils correspondaient aux écarts-types de ± 0,5 des moyennes nationales. La classification transversale entre les variables a révélé que 15,2 % des régions sanitaires présentaient un ratio forte utilisation/forte répartition, 18,5 %, un ratio faible utilisation/faible répartition; 4,3 %, un ratio forte utilisation/faible répartition, 2,2 % un ratio faible utilisation/forte répartition et 60,0 %, une combinaison de ratios utilisation modérée/répartition modérée. Conclusions : la répartition des physiothérapeutes et l’utilisation déclarée de services de physiothérapie varient selon les régions sanitaires, ce qui est indicateur d’inégalités potentielles à l’égard de l’accessibilité géographique. Puisque la plupart des provinces ont une approche régionale des effectifs en santé et de la prestation des services de santé, ces observations peuvent être utiles pour les gestionnaires et les décideurs, qui peuvent s’en servir pour faire une comparaison plus stricte des différences intraprovinciales et interprovinciales et des lacunes potentielles.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1. Statistics Canada. Population trends by age and sex, 2016 Census of Population [Internet]. Ottawa: Statistics Canada; 2017 [cited 2018 May 24]. Available from: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/11-627-m/11-627-m2017016-eng.htm.
2. Roberts KC, Rao DP, Bennett TL, et al. Prevalence and patterns of chronic disease multimorbidity and associated determinants in Canada. Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can: Res Pol Pract. 2015;35(6):87–94. https://doi.org/10.24095/hpcdp.35.6.01. Medline:26302227
3. Martinello N, Bhandari A, Santos J, et al. The role of physiotherapy in Canada: contributing to a stronger health care system. Ottawa: Conference Board of Canada; 2017.
4. Saskatchewan Physiotherapy Association. What is physiotherapy. Saskatoon, SK: The Association; 2015 [cited 2015 May 5]. Available from: http://www.saskphysio.org/physiotherapy/what-is-physiotherapy.
5. Marks D, Comans T, Bisset L, et al. Substitution of doctors with physiotherapists in the management of common musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review. Physiotherapy. 2017;103(4):341–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2016.11.006. Medline:28801031
6. Deslauriers S, Raymond MH, Laliberte M, et al. Variations in demand and provision for publicly funded outpatient musculoskeletal physiotherapy services across Quebec, Canada. J Eval Clin Pract. 2017;23(6):1489–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12838. Medline:29063716
7. Passalent L, Borsy E, Landry MD, et al. Geographic information systems (GIS): an emerging method to assess demand and provision for rehabilitation services. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(20):1740–9. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2012.750690. Medline:23343362
8. McFadden B, Jones McGrath K, Lowe T, et al. Examining the supply of and demand for physiotherapy in Saskatchewan: the relationship between where physiotherapists work and population health need. Physiother Can. 2016;68(4):335–45. https://doi.org/10.3138/ptc.2015-70. Medline:27904233
9. Bath B, Jakubowski M, Mazzei D, et al. Factors associated with reduced perceived access to physiotherapy services among people with low back disorders. Physiother Can. 2016;68(3):260–6. https://doi.org/10.3138/ptc.2015-50. Medline:27909375
10. Barnes S, Dolan L-A, Gardner B, et al. Equitable access to rehabilitation: realizing potential, promising practices, and policy directions. Toronto: Canadian Working Group on HIV and Rehabilitation and Wellesley Institute; 2012.
11. Dussault G, Franceschini M. Not enough there, too many here: understanding geographical imbalances in the distribution of the health workforce. Hum Resour Health. 2006;4(1):12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-4-12. Medline:16729892
12. Holyoke P, Verrier MC, Landry MD, et al. The distribution of physiotherapists in Ontario: understanding the market drivers. Physiother Can. 2012;64(4):329–37. https://doi.org/10.3138/ptc.2011-32. Medline:23997387
13. Adams R, Jones A, Lefmann S, et al. Rationing is a reality in rural physiotherapy: a qualitative exploration of service level decision-making. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15(1):121. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0786-3. Medline:25880469
14. Watanabe-Galloway S, Madison L, Watkins KL, et al. Recruitment and retention of mental health care providers in rural Nebraska: perceptions of providers and administrators. Rural Remote Health. 2015;15(4):3392. Medline:26567807
15. Sutherland G. The market profile of physiotherapists in Canada. Ottawa: Conference Board of Canada; 2017.
16. Saskatchewan Research Data Centre (SKY-RDC). Data sets available at the SKY-RDC [Internet]. Saskatoon: SKY–RDC; 2014 [cited 2015 Sep 28]. Available from: http://library.usask.ca/sky-rdc/Data.html.
17. Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI). Health workforce database methodology guide for data tables, 2014: medical laboratory technologists, medical radiation technologists, occupational therapists, pharmacists and physiotherapists. Ottawa: CIHI; 2015.
18. Statistics Canada. Age (in single years) and average age (127) and sex (3) for the population of Canada, provinces and territories, census divisions, census subdivisions and dissemination areas, 2016 census – 100% data [Internet]. Ottawa: Statistics Canada; 2018 [cited 2018 Sep 28]. Available from: https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2016/dp-pd/dt-td/Rp-eng.cfm?LANG=E&APATH=3&DETAIL=0&DIM=0&FL=A&FREE=0&GC=0&GID=0&GK=0&GRP=1&PID=109525&PRID=0&PTYPE=109445& S=0&SHOWALL=0&SUB=0&Temporal=2016&THEME=115&VID=0& VNAMEE=&VNAMEF=.
19. Statistics Canada. Health regions: boundaries and correspondence with census geography (HRP000b11a_e_Oct2013) [Internet]. Ottawa: Statistics Canada; 2013 [cited 2018 June 3]. Available from: http://www5.statcan.gc.ca/olc-cel/olc?ObjId=82-402-X2013002&ObjType=46&lang=en.
20. Cromley EK, McLafferty SL. GIS and public health. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2012.
21. Pong RW, DesMeules M, Lagacé C. Rural–urban disparities in health: how does Canada fare and how does Canada compare with Australia? Aust J Rural Health. 2009;17(1):58–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1584.2008.01039.x. Medline:19161503
22. Bath B, Trask C, McCrosky J, et al. Demographic and health characteristics of rural- and urban-dwelling Canadians with chronic back disorders: a population-based comparison. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(23):1960–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000000561. Medline:25365711
23. Lovo Grona S, Bath B, Bustamante L, et al. Case report: using a remote presence robot to improve access to physical therapy for people with chronic back disorders in an underserved community. Physiother Can. 2017;69(1):14–19. https://doi.org/10.3138/ptc.2015-77. Medline:28154440
24. Lovo Grona S, Bath B, Busch A, et al. Use of videoconferencing for physical therapy in people with musculoskeletal conditions: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2017;24(5):341–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633x17700781. Medline:28403669
25. Bath B, Lovo Grona S, Milosavljevic S, et al. Advancing interprofessional primary health care services in rural settings for people with chronic low back disorders: protocol of a community-based randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2016;5(4):e212. https://doi.org/10.2196/resprot.5914. Medline:27829573
26. Canada Health Act. RSC 1985, c C-6 (1985).
27. Landry MD, Deber RB, Jaglal S, et al. Assessing the consequences of delisting publicly funded community-based physical therapy on self-reported health in Ontario, Canada: a prospective cohort study. Int J Rehabil Res 2006;29(4):303–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/mrr.0b013e328010badc. Medline:17106346
28. Gordon M, Waines B, Englehart J, et al. The consequences of delisting publicly funded, community-based physical therapy services in Ontario: a health policy analysis. Physiother Can. 2007;59(1):58–69. https://doi.org/10.3138/ptc.59.1.58.
29. Paul J, Park L, Ryter E, et al. Delisting publicly funded community-based physical therapy services in Ontario, Canada: a 12-month follow-up study of the perceptions of clients and providers. Physiother Theory Pract. 2008;24(5):329–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593980802278397. Medline:18821440
30. Campbell J, Buchan J, Cometto G, et al. Human resources for health and universal health coverage: fostering equity and effective coverage. Bull World Health Organ. 2013;91(11):853–63. https://doi.org/10.2471/blt.13.118729. Medline:24347710
31. Landry MD, Tepper J, Verrier MC. Moving from “muddling throughˮ to careful planning: physical therapy human resources in Canada. Physiother Can. 2009;61(2):60–2. https://doi.org/10.3138/physio.61.2.60. Medline:20190987
32. Aday LA, Andersen RM. Equity of access to medical care: a conceptual and empirical overview. Med Care. 1981;19(12):4–27. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-198112001-00004. Medline:11643688
33. Thorpe JM, Thorpe CT, Kennelty KA, et al. Patterns of perceived barriers to medical care in older adults: a latent class analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11(1):181. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-181. Medline:21812953
34. Allin S, Grignon M, Le Grand J. Subjective unmet need and utilization of health care services in Canada: what are the equity implications? Soc Sci Med. 2010;70(3):465–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.10.027. Medline:19914759
35. Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI). Physiotherapists, 2016: Data tables. Ottawa: CIHI; 2016.
36. CIHI. Physiotherapist workforce, by place of employment and jurisdiction, Canada, 2007 to 2016 Physiotherapists, 2016: data tables. Ottawa: Canadian Institute for Health Information; 2016.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Physiotherapy Canada
Volume 71 • Number 3 • Summer 2019
Pages: 213 - 219
Copyright
© Canadian Physiotherapy Association.
History
Published online: 17 May 2019
Published in print: Summer 2019
Key Words:
Mots-clés :
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Related Content
Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Download article citation data for:
Physiotherapy Canada 2019 71:3, 213-219
Physiotherapy Canada 2019 71:3, 213-219