Challenges in LIS Education in China and the United States
Publication: Journal of Education for Library and Information Science
Volume 60, Number 1
Abstract
For decades, library and information science (LIS) education has been producing LIS professionals to serve people in all walks of life. But there are challenges to LIS education as society advances. This study performed quantitative and qualitative content analyses of data collected about LIS education in China and the United States. Four categories of challenges in LIS education are identified: (1) identity and accreditation, (2) survival and thriving, (3) curriculum update and enhancement, and (4) course delivery format and content. The challenges that each country encounters in LIS, as expected, are not the same, although some appear similar. All the challenges are discussed and contrasted in the context of each country’s traditions and practices in LIS education. Some suggestions are also made regarding how to successfully meet the challenges this study has explored. The findings of this study can help all constituencies (i.e., educators, practitioners, and students) to better understand the challenges of LIS education in China and the United States so that feasible measures can be developed to meet them. In addition, each country can benefit from this study by learning from what its counterpart has done in LIS education with regard to barriers and challenges.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Aharony, N. (2011). Library and information science students’ feedback in an online course. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 52(4), 305–319.
Albertson, D., Culbert, C., Snow, K., Spetka, K., & Hollenkamp, J. (Comps.). (2015). ALISE Statistical Report 2015. Seattle, WA: Association for Library and Information Science Education.
Albertson, D., Spetka, K., & Hill, S. (Comps.). (2016). ALISE Statistical Report 2016. Seattle, WA: Association for Library and Information Science Education.
American Library Association, Committee on Accreditation. (2015). Standards for Accreditation of Master’s Programs in Library and Information Studies. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/educationcareers/sites/ala.org.educationcareers/files/content/standards/Standards_2015_adopted_02-02-15.pdf
ASIS&T. (2007). Accreditation of programs for the education of information professionals. Silver Spring, MD: American Society for Information Science and Technology. Retrieved from http://www.asis.org/white_paper.html
Buchanan, E., Xie, H., Brown, M., & Wolfram, D. (2001). A systematic study of web-based and traditional instruction in an MLIS program: Success factors and implications for curriculum design. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 42(4), 274–288. https://doi.org/10.2307/40323996
Chawner, B. (2015). Library and information studies education in New Zealand and Australia: Background, issues, and challenges. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 56, Supplement 1, S17–S26.
Chen, C., Chen, Y., Si, L., Zan, C., & Feng, C. (2017). Forty years of development and innovation: Postgraduate education of library and information science in China. Journal of Library in China, 43(227), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.13530/j.cnki.jlis.170002
Chen, X., Ye, Z., Wang, Y., Xiong, Q., Gong, F., Hu, J., et al. (2016). Chinese style evaluation of disciplines: Problems and possible measures. Exploration and Contention, 9, 59–74.
China Degree and Graduate Education Information Network. (2017). About discipline evaluation. Retrieved from http://www.cdgdc.edu.cn/xwyyjsjyxx/xxsbdxz/276985.shtml
China Higher Education Information and Career Center. (2016). Catalog for institutions offering the professional MLIS degree. Retrieved from http://yz.chsi.com.cn/zsml/queryAction.do
Chu, H. (2010). Library and information science education in the digital age. In A. Wordsworth (Ed.), Advances in Librarianship (vol. 32, pp. 77–111). Bingley, England: Emerald Group.
Chu, H. (2012). iSchools vs. non-iSchools in the USA: An examination of their master’s programs. Education for Information, 29(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3233/efi-2010-0908
Committee on Degree Granting, Ministry of Education, China. (2016). Announcement on the closing of degree programs. Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.cn/s78/A22/xwb_left/zcywlm_xwgl/moe_818/201610/t20161019_285495.html
Cronin, B. (2000). Accreditation: Retool it or kill it. Library Journal, 125(11), 54.
Deng, S., & Ling, F. (2014). LIS education reform in the Big Data era based on information analytics. Journal of Information Resource Management, 3, 88–94. https://doi.org/10.13365/j.jirm.2014.03.088
Duan, Y., & Wang, C. (2016). Survey report on the development of the MLIS program in China 2015. Document, Information, Knowledge, 3, 116–128. https://doi.org/10.13366/j.dik.2016.03.116
Duan, Y., Yin, G., & Wu, C. (2015). Survey report on MLIS graduates’ satisfaction with their education. Document, Information, Knowledge, 1, 24–32. https://doi.org/10.13366/j.dik.2015.01.024
Ge, J., & Sun, Z. (2014). Innovative practices in establishing master’s programs in university libraries: Review and reflections on the 10th anniversary of the creation of the master’s program in information at the Shandong University of Science & Technology. Library & Information Services, 58(13), 45–50. https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2014.13.007
Hartley, R. J., & Virkus, S. (2003). Approaches to quality assurance and accreditation of LIS programmes: Experiences from Estonia and United Kingdom. Education for Information, 21, 31–48.
iSchools Consortium. (2017). Directory. Retrieved from http://ischools.org/members/directory/
Jank, J., Chu, H., & Koenig, M. (2013). Mergers, collaborations, alliances, and partnerships in LIS Education. In A. Wordsworth & W. D. Penniman (Eds.), Advances in Librarianship (vol. 36, pp. 185–222). Bingley, England: Emerald Group.
Jiang, Y., & Zheng, X. (2013). Exploration of the coordination mechanism between research degree and professional degree in library and information science. Library Development, 12, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-325X.2013.12.001
Kaur, T. (2015). Challenges and concerns for library and information science (LIS) education in India and South Asia. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, Supplement 1, 56, 6–16.
Li, Y., Yan, H., & Ke, P. (2011). Shaping MLIS as MBA: Reflections on MLIS education in China. Library & Information Service, 55(13), 24–27, 120.
Lopatovska, I., & Ransom, E. (2016). The state of L-Schools: Intellectual diversity and faculty composition. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 48(1), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000614533718
Mulvaney, P., & O’Connor, D. (2014). Rethinking how we rate and rank MLIS programs. Library Journal, 139(11), 37–38, 40.
Nkanu, W. O., Iyishu, V. A., & Ogar, F. O. (2013). Education and training for library and information science professionals in Nigeria: Their role, opportunities and challenges in the information age. Knowledge Review, 28(2), 1–10.
Partridge, H. L., Hanisch, J., Hughes, H. E., Henninger, M., Carroll, M., Combes, B., . . . & Yates, C. (2011). Re-conceptualising and re-poisitoning Australian library and information science education for the 21st century: Final report 2011. Sydney, Australia: Australian Learning & Teaching Council.
Pei, L. (2016). Comparison of LIS education in multiple countries based on an analysis of their curricula (Unpublished manuscript in Chinese).
Pradhan, S. (2014). Library and information science education in India: Perspectives and challenges. International Research: Journal of Library & Information Science, 4(1), 151–169.
Price, K. (Ed.). (2017). ALA accreditation at a glance. PRISM: The Office for Accreditation Newsletter, 25(1). Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/offices/accreditation/prp/prism/prism_current
Rosa, K. S. (Ed.). (2016). The state of the America’s libraries: A report from the American Library Association. American Libraries, Special Issue, 1–31. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/news/state-americas-libraries-report-2016
Rukwaro, M. W., & Bii, H. (2016). Library and information science (LIS) education and training in Kenya: Emergence, evolution, challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Library and Information Science, 8(2), 11–18.
Smith, L., Lastra, S., & Robins, J. (2001). Teaching online: Changing models of teaching and learning in LEEP. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 42(2), 348–363.
Sun, H., & Zuo, W. (2013). Comparison of the research and course offerings of information science programs in university libraries and colleges/departments. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 25(10), 118–122. https://doi.org/10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.2013.10.004
Unsworth, J. (2010). Draft responses to questions from the letter to the project team of academic unit reviews by Dean of Graduate School of Library & Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Retrieved from http://webdocs.lis.illinois.edu/comm/gslis.se.response.pdf
U.S. News & World Report. (2018). Best library and information science programs. Retrieved from https://www.usnews.com/best-graduate-schools/top-library-information-science-programs/library-information-science-rankings?int=a31a09
Wallace, D. P. (Ed.). (2012). ALISE Statistical Report 2012. Chicago, IL: Association for Library and Information Science Education.
Wozniczka-Paruzel, B. (2003). Experiences of library and information science (LIS) studies accreditation in the context of quality assurance systems in Poland. Education for Information, 21(1), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.3233/efi-2003-21106
Xiao, X. (2016). Thoughts on some issues in MLIS education. Documentation, Information & Knowledge, 1, 30–34. https://doi.org/10.13366/j.dik.2016.01.030
Yang, J. (2004). Reflections on the expansion and development of graduate education. China Higher Education Research, 5, 40–43. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-3667.2004.05.014
Yu, X., & Qu, S. (2015). Analysis of the master’s education of information science in China. Information Research, 215, 68–74. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-8095.2015.09.017
Yuan, B., & Li, F. (2016). An investigation and analysis of discipline evaluation in China. Journal of Higher Education, 37(3), 28–33.
Yukawa, J. (2010). Communities of practice for blended learning: Toward an integrated model for LIS education. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 51(2), 54–75.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Education for Library and Information Science
Volume 60 • Number 1 • January 2019
Pages: 35 - 61
Copyright
Association for Library and Information Science Education (ALISE), 2019.
History
Published in print: January 2019
Published online: 25 January 2019
Keywords:
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Related Content
Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Download article citation data for:
Journal of Education for Library and Information Science 2019 60:1, 35-61
Journal of Education for Library and Information Science 2019 60:1, 35-61