Research Article
15 March 2022

Sculpting, Cutting, Expanding, and Contracting the Map

Publication: Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization
Volume 57, Number 1

Résumé

Résumé

shaping est un outil Web qui permet de manipuler directement l’espace cartographique afin de sculpter, de retrancher, d’étendre et de contracter les régions d’une carte. En rupture avec la compréhension euclidienne rigide de l’espace projeté qui caractérise les systèmes d’information géographique (SIG), ces opérations permettent un travail de cartographie créative dans lequel l’espace est fluide, dynamique, relationnel et situé. Chaque opération est décrite en détail, accompagnée d’usages possibles suggérés par des textes sur la géographie et la cartographie. La plupart des manipulations de l’espace que permet shaping se traduisent en langage QGIS, ce qui permet la transformation des vecteurs et des couches de rasters de l’information géographique. En permettant la manipulation directe en temps réel de l’espace cartographique, shaping sert d’outil à l’expressivité appliquée à l’information géographique. C’est aussi un exemple de la manière dont on peut concevoir des outils accessibles qui, tout en étant compatibles avec les SIG existants, conservent leur propre utilité.

Abstract

shaping is a Web-based tool that enables direct manipulations of cartographic space to sculpt, cut, expand, and contract map regions. Breaking with rigid Euclidean understandings of projected space found in GIS, these operations support creative cartographic work that understands space as fluid, dynamic, relational, and situated. Each operation is described in detail, along with possible use cases informed by literature in geography and cartography. Most manipulations of space found in shaping can be translated into QGIS, enabling the transformation of vector and raster layers of geographic information. By enabling direct and real-time manipulation of cartographic space, shaping acts as an expressive tool that engages with geographic information. It is also an example of how accessible tools can be built that are interoperable with existing GIS while still being useful on their own.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Bergmann, Luke, and Nick Lally. 2021. “For geographical imagination systems.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 111(1): 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2020.1750941.
Bergmann, Luke R., and David O’Sullivan. 2017. “Computing with Many Spaces: Generalizing Projections for the Digital Geohumanities and GIScience.” In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSPATIAL Workshop on Geospatial Humanities – GeoHumanities’17, 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1145/3149858.3149866.
Boeing, Geoff. 2020. “The Right Tools for the Job: The Case for Spatial Science Tool-Building.” Transactions in GIS 24(5): 1299–1314. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12678.
Brown, Kathryn. 2010. “The Artist as Urban Geographer Mark Bradford and Julie Mehretu.” American Art 24(3): 100–113. https://doi.org/10.1086/658211.
Bunge, William. 1988. Nuclear War Atlas. Oxford: Blackwell.
Caquard, Sébastien. 2013. “Cartography I: Mapping Narrative Cartography.” Progress in Human Geography 37(1): 135–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132511423796.
Cope, Meghan, and Sarah Elwood, eds. 2009. Qualitative GIS: A Mixed Methods Approach, 1st ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dalang, Oliver. n.d. “VectorBender.” https://github.com/olivierdalang/VectorBender.
Derickson, Kate Driscoll. 2017. “Urban Geography II: Urban Geography in the Age of Ferguson.” Progress in Human Geography 41(2): 230–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132515624315.
Gahegan, Mark. 2018. “Our GIS Is Too Small.” Canadian Geographer/Géographe Canadien 62(1): 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12434.
Gastner, M.T., and M.E.J. Newman. 2004. “From the Cover: Diffusion-Based Method for Producing Density-Equalizing Maps.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101(20): 7499–7504. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0400280101.
Gatrell, Anthony C. 1983. Distance and Space: A Geographical Perspective. Contemporary Problems in Geography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gieseking, Jack Jen. 2013. “Where We Go from Here: The Mental Sketch Mapping Method and Its Analytic Components.” Qualitative Inquiry 19(9): 712–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800413500926.
Gieseking, Jen Jack. 2020. “Mapping Lesbian and Queer Lines of Desire: Constellations of Queer Urban Space.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 38(5): 941–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775820926513.
Gilmore, Ruth Wilson. 2007. Golden Gulag: Prisons, Surplus, Crisis, and Opposition in Globalizing California. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Huffman, Daniel. 2018. “On Airline Mapping.” In Something about Maps. Available at https://somethingaboutmaps.wordpress.com/2018/05/15/on-airline-mapping/.
Iosifescu Enescu, Cristina M., Jacques Montangero, and Lorenz Hurni. 2015. “Toward Dream Cartography: Mapping Dream Space and Content.” Cartographica 50(4): 224–37. https://doi.org/10.3138/cart.50.4.3137.
Kelly, Meghan. 2019. “Mapping Syrian Refugee Border Crossings: A Feminist Approach.” Cartographic Perspectives, no. 93 (November). https://doi.org/10.14714/CP93.1406.
Knowles, Anne Kelly, Levi Westerveld, and Laura Strom. 2015. “Inductive Visualization: A Humanistic Alternative to GIS.” GeoHumanities 1(2): 233–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/2373566X.2015.1108831.
Kwan, Mei-Po. 2002. “Feminist Visualization: Re-envisioning GIS as a Method in Feminist Geographic Research.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 92(4): 645–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8306.00309.
Lally, Nick. 2022. shaping. Available at https://github.com/nicklally/shaping.
Lally, Nick, and Luke Bergmann. 2019. “Mapping Dynamic, Non-Euclidean Spaces.” In Abstracts of the ICA, 15–20 July, Toyko, Japan, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-1-204-2019.
Lally, Nick, and Luke Bergmann. 2021. “enfolding: An Experimental geographical imagination systems (gis).” In A Place More Void, ed. Paul Kingsbury and Anna J. Secor, 167–80. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Massey, Doreen. 2005. For Space. London: Sage.
McGlynn, Evangeline, and Will Payne. 2020. “New Relational Approaches to Cartography: Pseudo-Spatial Workflows.” Read at the North American Cartographic Information Society Annual Meeting, 16 October. Online. Available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1PBRHafxXg.
Noterman, Elsa. Forthcoming. “Speculating on Vacancy.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. Published in Early View, 10 June 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12477.
O’Sullivan, David, Luke Bergmann, and Jim E. Thatcher. 2017. “Spatiality, Maps, and Mathematics in Critical Human Geography: Toward a Repetition with Difference.” Professional Geographer 70(1): 129–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2017.1326081.
Pearce, Margaret Wickens, and Michael James Hermann. 2010. “Mapping Champlain’s Travels: Restorative Techniques for Historical Cartography.” Cartographica 45(1): 32–46. https://doi.org/10.3138/carto.45.1.32.
p5js. n.d. Available at https://p5js.org/.
Poorthuis, Ate, and Matthew Zook. 2020. “Being Smarter about Space: Drawing Lessons from Spatial Science.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 110(2): 349–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2019.1674630.
Roth, Robert E. 2020. “Cartographic Design as Visual Storytelling: Synthesis and Review of Map-Based Narratives, Genres, and Tropes.” Cartographic Journal 58(1): 83–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087041.2019.1633103.
Roth, Robert E., Cynthia A. Brewer, and Michael S. Stryker. 2011. “A Typology of Operators for Maintaining Legible Map Designs at Multiple Scales.” Cartographic Perspectives 68 (March): 29–64. https://doi.org/10.14714/CP68.7.
Scapetoad. n.d. “Scapetoad: Not Just One Metric.” Available at http://scapetoad.choros.place/index.php.
Sieber, R.E. 2004. “Rewiring for a GIS/2.” Cartographica 39(1): 25–39. https://doi.org/10.3138/T6U8-171M-452W-516R.
Takahashi, Naohisa. 2008. “An Elastic Map System with Cognitive Map-Based Operations.” In International Perspectives on Maps and the Internet, ed. Michael P. Peterson, 73–87. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72029-4_5.
Thompson, Nato, Jeffrey Kastner, and Trevor Paglen. 2008. Experimental Geography. New York: Melville House; Independent Curators International.
Tobler, Waldo. 2004. “On the First Law of Geography: A Reply.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94(2): 304–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.09402009.x.
Tobler, Waldo Rudolph. 1961. “Map Transformations of Geographic Space.” PhD thesis, University of Washington.
Tobler, Waldo 1970. “A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region.” Economic Geography 46(June): 234-240. https://doi.org/10.2307/143141.
Weber Reuschel, Anne-Kathrin, Barbara Piatti, and Lorenz Hurni. 2014. “Data-Driven Expansion of Dense Regions in Literary Geography.” Cartographic Journal 51(2): 123–40. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743277414Y.0000000077.
Westerveld, Levi, and Anne K. Knowles. 2021. “Loosening the Grid: Topology as the Basis for a More Inclusive GIS.” International Journal of Geographical Information Science 35(10): 2108–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2020.1856854.
Wilson, Matthew W. 2021. “GIScience I: Social Histories and Disciplinary Crucibles.” Progress in Human Geography 45(1): 166–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132520936741.
Yamamoto, Daisuke, Shotaro Ozeki, and Naohisa Takahashi. 2009. “Focus+Glue+Context: An Improved Fisheye Approach for Web Map Services.” In Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems – GIS ’09, 101. Seattle: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/1653771.1653788.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Cartographica
Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization
Volume 57Number 1Spring 2022
Pages: 1 - 10

History

Submitted: 3 August 2021
Received: 3 August 2021
Accepted: 9 October 2021
Published in print: Spring 2022
Published online: 15 March 2022

Keywords:

  1. visual art
  2. relational space
  3. non-Euclidean
  4. GIS
  5. geographical imagination systems

Mots clés :

  1. art visuel
  2. espace relationnel
  3. non euclidien
  4. SIG
  5. systèmes d’imagination géographique

Authors

Affiliations

Nick Lally
Biography: Nick Lally is an assistant professor in the Department of Geography at the University of Kentucky. His research interests include speculative cartography, critical computation, and technologies of policing.
Department of Geography / University of Kentucky / Lexington / Kentucky / United States

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

VIEW ALL METRICS

Related Content

Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Format





Download article citation data for:
Nick Lally
Cartographica 2022 57:1, 1-10

View Options

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

View options

PDF

View PDF

EPUB

View EPUB

Full Text

View Full Text

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media

About Cookies On This Site

We use cookies to improve user experience on our website and measure the impact of our content.

Learn more

×