Research Article
2018

Phraseology, argumentation and identity in the Supreme Court of Ireland's judgments on language policy

Publication: Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice
Volume 11, Number 3

Abstract

The Irish judiciary's approach to bilingualism as the constitutional guarantee of the right to use either Irish or English for any official purpose has proved highly flexible. However, while emphasis has been laid on principles of constitutional interpretation from the practitioner's perspective, the discursive dimension of cases involving language policy has yet to be fully elucidated. This paper combines quantitative analysis with a qualitative perspective to focus on phraseological and argumentative patterns in Supreme Court judgments on language policy, based on a small corpus. First, the ten most frequent lexical bundles of the corpus were extracted to study the main discourse functions of phraseology in context. Second, a manual text analysis was conducted of the two cases where recurrent phraseological patterns were most widely attested. This allowed for the isolation of the argument schemes underlying the structure of the Justices’ opinions. While phraseology points to a shared institutional identity of Irish Justices as gatekeepers of the Constitution, the use of argumentative patterns suggests that they may forge heterogeneous professional identities, by shifting from a rigouristic view of language rights to forms of judicial pragmatism.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice
Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice
Volume 11Number 32018
Pages: 315 - 337

History

Published in print: 2018
Published online: 4 November 2024

Keywords

  1. Orchestrator
  2. Arranger
  3. Broadway
  4. Hollywood
  5. Leonid Raab
  6. Film Score Orchestration

Authors

Affiliations

Davide Mazzi [email protected]
Author
Biography: Davide Mazzi is Assistant Professor in English Language and Translation at the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia. His research activity has focused on discourse analysis, corpus linguistics and argumentation studies. In particular, his research interests have concentrated on legal, academic, healthcare and news discourse. His recent publications include: ‘“Our reading would lead to...”: Corpus Perspectives on Pragmatic Argumentation in US Supreme Court Judgments’ (Journal of Argumentation in Context, 2014) and The Theoretical Background and Practical Implications of Argumentation in Ireland (Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2016).
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

VIEW ALL METRICS

Related Content

Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Format





Download article citation data for:
Davide Mazzi
Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice 2018 11:3, 315-337

View Options

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

View options

PDF

View PDF

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media

About Cookies On This Site

We use cookies to improve user experience on our website and measure the impact of our content.

Learn more

×