Research Article
15 September 2020

Requesting Examples in Psychodiagnostic Interviews

Publication: Communication & Medicine
Volume 16, Number 2

Abstract

As part of a larger research project on understanding change in helping professions, this paper investigates into therapists’ requesting examples and their interactional and sequential contri-bution to clients’ change. Requesting examples by therapists in psychodiagnostic interviews explicitly or implicitly criticize the patient's prior turn as insufficient, i.e. as unclear, vague, or as too general. Such a request opens a retro-sequence (Schegloff 2007) and in the following provides for a description that both helps clarify the semantic vagueness and evinces psychic or relational aspects of the topic at hand. While the patient's insufficient presentation is initi-ated by a prior request of the therapist, the patient's example presentation is regularly fol-lowed by the therapist's summarizing comments or by further requests focusing on the pa-tient's problem. Requesting examples thus are a particular case of requests that follow ‘ex-pandable responses’ as described by Muntigl & Zabala (2008); they follow the same sequential organization, yet, given that they make examples conditionally relevant, they are more specif-ic. With the help of this sequential organization both participants co-construct elements of common knowledge. Such an ‘interplay of understanding’ (Voutilainen & Peräkylä 2014) al-lows the therapist to pursue the overall aim of therapy, i.e. to increase the patients’ awareness of their distorted perceptions, and thus to pave the way for change. The data comprises of 16 videotaped first interviews following the manual of the Operationalized Psychodynamic Di-agnostics (OPD Task Force 2009). It was collected in cooperation with the Clinic for General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatic at the University Clinic of Heidelberg.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Communication & Medicine
Communication & Medicine
Volume 16Number 22020
Pages: 129 - 141

History

Published online: 15 September 2020
Published in print: 2020

Keywords

  1. Philosophical theology
  2. Christian identity
  3. Curkpatrick
  4. aphorism
  5. Australian theology

Authors

Affiliations

Thomas Spranz-Fogasy [email protected]
Author
Biography: Researcher in the Pragmatics Department Adjunct Professor at the University of Mannheim
Institut fuer Deutsche Sprache
Eva-Maria Graf [email protected]
Author
Biography: Department of English and American Studies
Alpen-Adria-University of Klagenfurt
Johannes C. Ehrenthal [email protected]
Author
Biography: Institute of Medical Psychology
Christoph Nikendei [email protected]
Author
Biography: Department for General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

VIEW ALL METRICS

Related Content

Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Format





Download article citation data for:
Spranz-FogasyThomas, GrafEva-Maria, EhrenthalJohannes C., and NikendeiChristoph
Communication & Medicine 2020 16:2, 129-141

View Options

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

View options

PDF

View PDF

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media

About Cookies On This Site

We use cookies to improve user experience on our website and measure the impact of our content.

Learn more

×